Our Policies

 

 R&A Education works to minimise complaints by working pro-actively with students and their representatives to make sure that they are involved at all levels in the committee structure, by encouraging regular feedback through student representatives.

 

This statement of policy, together with the accompanying detailed procedure, is designed to ensure that the Student Complaints Procedure is open, equal, fair and unbiased and that complaints are addressed at the earliest possible opportunity.

 

R&A Education would wish that students try to address any concerns informally as soon as these are raised and that they seek early resolution whenever possible.

 

R&A Educations Policy: 

 

Complaints may be made by registered students of The Centre or by individuals who have until recently been so registered.

 

Registered students must make their complaint within 30 calendar days of the origin of their concern.

 

Individuals who are no longer registered students must make their complaint within 30 calendar days of the cessation of their registration.

 

       The Centre recognises that, on occasion, a group of students may wish to raise a common concern in which case the group should nominate one of its number to act as its representative and to receive the response from the Centre.

  • Complaints must be made directly by the student/s concerned
  • Within the scope of this policy, complaints may be made about:
    • The delivery of a programme of study
    • Misleading or incorrect information presented in written form
    • Poor quality of facilities or learning resources provided by the Centre
    • Inefficiencies in administration
    • Appeals against decisions made by the Extenuating Circumstances Panel unless it is alleged that the correct procedure has not been followed

 

  • Appeals against assignment grades
  • Appeals against progression decisions made by the appropriate College boards
  • Anonymous or third party complaints
  • Allegations of academic malpractice
  • Complaints about the decisions made in the course of disciplinary proceedings

 

 

Aligned with the Office of the Independent Adjudicator’s Good Practise Framework, R&A Education has devised a three-stage complaints procedure:

 

Prompt resolution with an emphasis on the affected departments or individuals. An official phase that consists of a written complaint, an investigation conducted by senior management, and a formal written response that specifies the process’s conclusion. The complainant may initiate the review phase should they be dissatisfied with the resolution of their formal complaint.

 

STAGE 1: EARLY RESOLUTION 

 

R&A Education advises all parties involved in a complaint to make every effort to resolve the matter amicably as soon as is practically possible following the revelation of the concern. Prior to proceeding, the complainant ought to address the matter with the staff member who is most promptly occupied with the situation. It could be a member of staff or the programme manager. In contrast, a student may approach their group student representative with an issue, such as a concern regarding the delivery of a programme; the representative would then bring up the matter during a Programme Team meeting.

 

A personal meeting is the most probable means of achieving a resolution; nevertheless, it might be suitable to communicate specifics regarding the outcome in writing.

 

At Stage 1, the complaint must be submitted within a reasonable timeframe, not exceeding ten working days, subsequent to the occurrence of the issue. Additionally, the staff member in question must make every effort to resolve the matter via a meeting with the complainant within a maximum of ten business days from the date their attention was drawn to the issue.

 

The Centre hopes that the majority of complaints will be resolved amicably for all parties involved at this juncture.

 

When a concern is to be raised during a Programme Team meeting, it is the responsibility of the group student representative to ensure that the matter is included on the agenda for the upcoming meeting.

 

 

STAGE 2: A FORMAL COMPLAINT 

 

Attempts to resolve the complaint at Stage 1 are not satisfactory to the complainant, or early resolution is either unfeasible or inappropriate. In such cases, the complainant may proceed to Stage 2 and file a formal complaint.

 

Formal complaints should be submitted on the designated complaints form, which can be obtained from the reception desk of R&A Educations. Complaints should be received no later than 10 working days subsequent to an unsuccessful attempt at early resolution, or within 30 calendar days of the issue’s inception if no attempt at early resolution has been made.

 

The complaints form necessitates its complete completion and signature, and in the event that early resolution has not been attempted, the complainant is required to provide an explanation for this omission.

 

Complaint forms must be submitted to the office within the specified timeframes; a written confirmation of receipt will be issued within five business days. Extensions to the published timeframes are only permissible under extenuating circumstances, and the Extenuating Circumstances Panel will determine the application process.

 

The aforementioned initial evaluation may result in the following: referral of the complainant to an alternative procedure; rejection of the complaint; or formal investigation of the complaint. Regardless of the situation, written notification must be provided to the complainant within ten business days, accompanied by explicit justifications for the decision.

 

When a specific individual is named as the subject of the complaint, that person will be requested to furnish a written statement of response.

 

A consultation will be undertaken with the complainant in order to mutually ascertain their comprehension of the investigation’s objectives and boundaries. The complainant shall be permitted the company of a peer companion (another student) or a representative of their student organisation. There will be a written record maintained.

Upon the completion of the investigation, the Centre will generate a report detailing their conclusions along with the rationale behind them. The Academic Board and the complainant or their representative will subsequently be provided with the report.

 

The report will additionally provide the complainant with details regarding their entitlement to escalate their complaint to the review stage, the criteria that qualify them for this option, the duration required, and the prescribed procedure to adhere to.

 

 

STAGE 3: A FORMAL REVIEW 

 

  • A complainant may request a review of the formal complaint procedure’s decision if they are dissatisfied with its outcome. Requests for reviews must be submitted within ten business days of the Formal Complaint Report’s mailing. Requests for a formal review may be submitted on the following grounds:

 

  • That the complaints procedure was not adhered to appropriately (pending proof to the contrary), and that the result was irrational (subject to the provision of evidence to show that the findings were not sufficiently substantiated)

 

  • A Formal Complaint Review shall refrain from reassessing the initial complaint or undertaking any further investigation unless there is substantial evidence of newness.
  • The initial assessment will determine whether the review request satisfies the necessary criteria and timeframe for the acceptance of the necessity for review. During this phase, the complainant might be requested to provide further details.

 

  • The process will be considered concluded once the complainant is notified in writing within ten business days if the review request is determined to be ineligible. The complainant will be provided with information regarding independent review and the Office of the Independent Adjudicator at that juncture.

 

 

  • In the event that the review request is determined to be eligible, the complainant will be notified in writing of the procedure determined for the review within a period of 10 working days.

 

  • A timetable projection will be provided.

 

 

  • In the event that the review fails to validate the complaint, written notification of the decision must be provided to the complainant within a period of 30 calendar days.
  • Should the complaint be affirmed, the complainant ought to be notified in writing and within the same timeframe of the process how and when any proposed remedy will be executed, as well as whether an apology is required.
  • It is imperative that the complainant be provided with explicit justifications for the decision, irrespective of its manifestation.
  •  
  • Regardless of the outcome of the review, the complainant should be duly informed of their entitlement to lodge a complaint with the Office of the Independent Adjudicator, along with the specified timeframe in which they may exercise this right.
  • Complaints are typically required to be submitted to the Office of the Independent Adjudicator within three months from the date the internal review is concluded, as per the Good Practise Framework.